Sample Essay For Writing Contest - Things You Need to Keep in Mind

Sample Essay For Writing Contest - Things You Need to Keep in MindAre you the kind of person who likes to do their own writing? Then you should know that there are things you can do to make your essay better when writing a sample essay for writing contest.Many of these contests have an entry fee. Most of them have the basic type of contest where you need to create a very brief, short and effective essay. However, some people who are too lazy or don't have the time to create a good essay usually find an easier way.You can write it yourself. There is free software available which can be downloaded and used to make your essay even better. Some of these programs are not easy to use, but once you do get one it will save you lots of time. It will also help you if you are learning how to write well.Writing a good essay is not easy and can be boring for some of us. However, writing a more complex essay is the most challenging part of this task because it involves complex ideas which take a l ong time to come out.You can easily write an essay on a certain topic without writing about any other subject. If you want to write an essay about a lot of different subjects, then you need to have more knowledge about them. So, first of all, you need to get more knowledge on the topics that you are going to write about.You can then start writing on the topic that you are more familiar with and let the rest of the essay has become a personal information about yourself and your experiences and thoughts about it. When you have already written an essay that you think is impressive and has all the required information to support your thesis then all you need to do is add some details to the essay.Finally, you need to put in the essay the links to your website and other resources that you are using to support your argument. This is a basic and most important thing that you need to remember when you write a sample essay for writing contest.

Roy Jenkins

Thesis This discussion affirms why Roy Jenkins was not only a great British politician, but also the most suited writer to write the biography of England’s exemplary Prime Minister and warlord – Winston Churchill.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Roy Jenkins – Churchill: A Biography specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Summary of Roy Jenkins’ Churchill: A Biography In Churchill: A Biography, Roy Jenkins as the author gives a detailed analysis of the personality and life of Churchill right from childhood coupled with his political life during and after the Second World War. Having served in top leadership positions, the author provides an elaborate narration of Churchill’s remarkable career in well-structured overarching themes. The brilliant breadth of knowledge and elegant intelligence makes Churchill: A Biography one of the best biographies of Churchill. The book is divided into si x parts and each part covers different sections of Churchill’s life as from 1874 to 1965. These sections are accompanied by references, selected bibliographies, glossary of parliamentary terms, and index pages to give the reader a good comprehension of the narration. The first section deals with the young Winston Churchill and his life with his father, Lord Randolph, who was a member Tory Party. Here, the author presents a side of Winston Churchill that does not shy away from confessing his love for his mother The second section, The Glow-worm Glows: The Morning was Golden 1908-1914, introduces the reader to a young diplomat who spent time uniting with some Tory MPs such as Ian Malcolm and Arthur Stanley. These Mps were renamed the Hughligans due to their offensive and critic character. The subsequent section focuses on Churchill’s Admiralty and his life. It introduces readers to a controversial Churchill who facilitated the Dardanelles/Gallipoli campaign, which failed , thus forcing him to pull out and move to the military in France.1 Part three and four introduce readers to a determined Churchill who after failing in the Dardanelines/Gallipoli campaign, serves as a battalion commander in France and then as a Secretary for War.Advertising Looking for essay on biography? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More However, after the fall of the Liberal Party, he fails to win a seat until he is elected as an independent MP in the 1924 elections. He later on served as Chancellor of the Exchequer. At the brink of the Second World War, Neville Chamberlain invited him back where he served in the First Lord and Admiralty and then took over the post of Neville Chamberlain as the Prime Minister. The zenith of the narration is in part five, The Savior of His Country and the Light of the World- 1939-1945, where the leadership of Churchill is evident. His motivational speeches encouraged the British army to soldie r on even when Hitler was at the brink of winning the war. Churchill played a critical role in helping the Britain succeed in the war. Section 6 focuses on the final moments of Churchill’s life. Jenkins elaborates on Churchill’s peaceful campaigns. In a recap, the book introduces readers to a man who lived a very long and dynamic life. From the onset, Winston Churchill lived a life full of action, conflict, challenges, and accomplishments. Critical Analysis of Roy Jenkins and Churchill Biography Churchill: A Biography is another book to add to the list of books that give a description of Winston Churchill. The book comes with a difference considering how it illustrates a bloated, but distinctive life of one of the greatest prime ministers of the Great Britain. Reading through the book one understands why Roy Jenkins was a respected diplomat in Britain as well as a historian. As it has been with the other 19 books written by Jenkins, his knowledge in British political h istory is insightful. Napoleon may have joined the politics of Europe, which had a massive vacuum that needed to be filled. He filled these gaps without faking anything. Conversely, Churchill did not find any vacuum when he joined politics apart from the one he experienced in the Conservative Party. Nonetheless, he created his own space to make a name for himself through strength and aptitude. Lord Jenkins notes that Churchill grew to become the ultimate challenge, an assumption that he portrayed splendidly.2 Therefore, what are some of the hallmarks of the book? what is in Churchill: A Biography that lacks in other books like My Early Life and The Second World War? A reader of the latter books will question how Jenkins narrates the story of Churchill differently to distinguish him from previous and current writers focusing on the same topic. Jenkins had served in various political positions during his lifetime such as the Home Secretary as well as the Chancellor of the Exchequer. H e also served as the President of the European Commission and later on as the Chancellor of Oxford. Serving in such positions gave him an actual feeling of the merits and demerits of operating at such social levels. He joked that someone in demanding positions as Churchill has a right to have good meals, drinks, and environment.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Roy Jenkins – Churchill: A Biography specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The incidences in Jenkins’ life gave him a remarkable comprehension of some of happenings in Churchill’s life that are often sealed from many observers. He was in a position to see Churchill as a reformist who could not allow other politicians such as Lloyd George to outshine his efforts. His reforms were evident in issues pertaining to prisons and Labor exchanges. Churchill adopted a liberal mindset when it came to issues affecting England. In his second tenure, he supported the efforts of Macmillan to provide shelter to most homeless citizens, although the shanties that emerged after the program posed a risk to urban planning. Jenkins also gives a good account of Churchill’s performance as the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the onset of 20th Century, which was the era of the Gold Standard. He was against the Gold Standard, but he was persuaded by the connection between the gold influence and the Two-Power Standard. He further agreed with the Treasury as well as the Bank of England, which stated that the reserve currency was of great essence to the city. Jenkins also gives a depth analysis of Churchill’s wealth. He clearly takes a different path from other authors who have often shied away from this issue. His explanation is thorough that one will imagine he had access to Churchill’s financial statements. Most biographers find it difficult to access the bank accounts of their protagonists. However, from the studies done by Jenkins, the reader is startled by how much Churchill earned during his political life. Jenkins converts the amount into contemporary value. Though he undervalues the amount, readers can easily rectify the mistake and quantify Churchill’s wealth. The author does not also fail to describe the domestic life of Churchill, which reveals an amazing character of Churchill -a man who loved moving from one residence to another. He frequently traded his properties such as flats and hotel suites. He was a frequent traveler and he visited almost all the continents. He was always up to something, not only political, but also business and social events. Essentially, he was a scrounger who dined and slept in other people’s homes. Nonetheless, Jenkins does not mention if Churchill was a frequent tipper, but the reader will likely conclude that he was one given such a lifestyle.Advertising Looking for essay on biography? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More An insightful analysis of Churchill: A Biography reveals how Jenkins portrays his distorted mindset towards Churchill and his explanation of the people who venerated Churchill and those who gave him little attention. The author narrates that Churchill was a man who was loved and hated with equal measure. His influence met opposition and support by other politicians who gradually faded away after confessing how their hatred resulted in humiliation. Jenkins gives an amazing contrast between Churchill and Adolph Hitler, the German autocrat who showed compassion to his formal family and showered them with gifts during birthdays and any other special day in their lives. Even in his writings, Jenkins’ character is still evident. A reader understands his writing prowess. His love for names is overtly evident. For instance, the name Hotel Prince de Galles will only befit normal conversations, but most publishers and editors will have issues with long names that appear in almost every page and thus ask for their removal.3 If the editors proceeded with such alteration, then it will have created space for Jenkins to incorporate some of the issues that are lacking in his writing. Some of these deficits are associated with the First World War. Jenkins fails to mention how Churchill advocated for tanks. The presence of weapons, barbed wire, and trenches during the war helped many Edwardian scholars to know of Churchill’s support for the tanks in connection with the armored land ship. Churchill was among the main individuals who facilitated the landing of the greatest tank at Hatfield Park.4 Another clear shortfall of the book has to do with Turkey. Turkey was involved in the purchase of modern weapons from Germany and Britain under the leadership of the Young Turks. The Ottoman Empire had signed a contract with Britain to build super-dreadnoughts. The ships were of great esteem and power. With the looming war, Churchill requested for the armors from the Royal Navy. He clearly had no other option. The reaction from the Turks was outrageous. Books dealing with the World War History such as The World Crisis have indicated that the Turkeys’ reaction almost promoted Churchill to make it an ally. Nonetheless, Germany reacted quickly to fill the vacuum. They gave Turkey their battle cruiser and light cruiser to convince the Turks to trust Germany as its ally. This battle cruiser later triggered a fight in Sebastopol.5 Turkey had the option of siding with either Germany or Britain. However, Churchill failed in convincing it to join him. Consequently, this occurrence forced Britain to wage war against Turkey. Though Britain won the battle against the Ottoman Empire, the war generated a long-lasting confusion. Another issue will be how Jenkins portrays Moran in his book. In essence, Jenkins is not obligated to know everyone by his/her title, but his unkindness to Moran is a trivial mistake. Jenkins claims that Moran was self-regarding as he refers to his (Moran) diaries. He accuses Moran of taking a central position, but failing to give reliable and discreet chain of events. With such a perception, many readers may conclude that Moran was just like many other doctors who used the name of patients to seek popularity, but he was a dedicated doctor. In addition, Jenkins erroneously refers to Russell Brian as a neurological surgeon.6 Despite the few deficits, Jenkins’ book is well presented. It has a properly outlined table of contents guiding the reader into the world of Churchill. The book also contains an index to help the reader refer on issues that need further understanding. Jenkins wisely includes his comments on the Churchill writings such as My Early Life without conflicting with the central themes. The author has succeeded in balancing the life and times of Churchill as well as the history that occurred during his times. It is worth noting the numerous instances where Jenkins opted to use French expressio ns such as villeguature and va-et-vient when he could have used English expressions. Perhaps his position as the President of the European Union introduced him to a number of European languages.7 Conclusion The book, Churchill: A Biography, has many pages, which may discourage many readers as they may find it tedious. However, such an attitude is bound to change soon after one goes through the content of the book. Just as many other bestselling books, no reader will wish the book were a page lesser. Jenkins’ narration and the fact that he summarized the life of a political hero in a single book will attract more readers. Its shortcomings are overshadowed by the insightful thoughts evident throughout the book. As a student, I often had varied opinions about the Prime Minister, hence creating confusion, which I well deserved. However, this book has cleared my perceptions and I can now visualize Churchill and describe him without ambiguity. Bibliography Adonis, Andrew, and Keith Thomas. Roy Jenkins: A Retrospective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2004. Churchill, Winston. The World Crisis, 1911-1918. New York, NY: Free Press, 2005. Jenkins, Roy. Churchill: A Bibliography. New York, NY: Plume, 2001. Footnotes 1Roy Jenkins, Churchill: A Bibliography (New York: Plume, 2001), 201. 2Jenkins, 284 3Winston Churchill, The World Crisis, 1911-1918, (New York: Free Press, 2005), 113. 4 Andrew Adonis and Keith Thomas, Roy Jenkins: A Retrospective, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 86. 5 Churchill, 96 6Jenkins, 321 7 Adonis and Thomas, 54 This essay on Roy Jenkins – Churchill: A Biography was written and submitted by user Julianne Kirk to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Class Essay-Type Questions and Responses Essays

Class Essay-Type Questions and Responses Essays Class Essay-Type Questions and Responses Essay Class Essay-Type Questions and Responses Essay Essay Topic: Questions The story â€Å"Journey by Night† by Norah Burke, as suggested by the title, talks about the journey of a young boy called Sher Singh in order to save his little brother. It shows the courage and determination shown by him in spite of the darkness and unknown dangers that may have existed in the forest. Sher Singh was a boy of nearly twelve years of age living in Laldwani village. He showed immense courage in absence of his father to carry his younger brother to the hospital fifty miles away from his village crossing dense forest and two rivers. He was heroic in his successful attempt to save his brother’s life. Life offers many challenges and it is only the brave ones who face those challenges with extreme dexterity and courage and emerge victorious. Sher Singh was one of them who did not care about his own pains, his tiredness, his fears and agonies and walked with the weight of his brother on his shoulders to take him to the hospital. He did not waste even a second to decide to take the journey by night through the dark jungle with two rivers in the midway out of which one was flooded. One by one he crossed all the barriers and headed towards his destination. He had no option but to keep on striving so that his brother may be able to survive, and he made that remarkable choice. He cared a lot for his brother. He did not lose hope and kept moving forward. His character is a source of inspiration for many who limit themselves and suffer from hidden fears and are unable to conquer it. He was focussed and dedicated which made him live and reach his destination, which can be followed by anyone. Therefore, at the end when he is referred to as â€Å"Sher Singh Bahadur†, a title conferred to his father, the readers feel is as if not more courageous than his father, because his father’s courage was all a part of his profession and passion but Sher Singh’s courage was shown to save his brother’s life. The story â€Å"India’s Heroes† f

Human systems - nutrition Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Human systems - nutrition - Essay Example Proteins are large organic compounds made of amino acids arranged in a linear chain and joined together by peptide bonds. Proteins include structural proteins, enzymes, nucleoproteins, proteins that transport oxygen, muscle protein, and many other types of proteins that have specific functions (Guyton, 1986). Proteins differ from one another in their nutritive value and maybe classified into three groups (Pruthi, 1999): Fats are organic compounds made up of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Fats are the most concentrated source of energy in foods, and they belong to a group of substances called lipids (Food and Nutrition Board, 2005). Dietary fat consists primarily (98 %) of triacylglycerol, which is composed of one glycerol molecule esterified with three fatty acid molecules, and smaller amounts of phospholipids and sterols (Food and Nutrition Board, 2005). Fatty acids are hydrocarbon chains that contain a methyl (CH3-) and a carboxyl (-COOH) end (Food and Nutrition Board, 2005). The fatty acids vary in carbon chain length, and may be saturated or unsaturated depending on their proportions (Food and Nutrition Board, 2005). Sources of fat include cooking fats and oils, butter, margarine, fried foods, animal products etc (Pruthi, 1999). Minerals are found as a constituent of the mineral matter of the bones, as structural constituents of the soft tissues and as constituents of physiologically active substances e.g. Iron in haemoglobin. The important minerals are calcium, phosphorous and iron. Vitamins are nutrients and biomolecules required in small amounts (Lieberman & Bruning 1990; Pruthi 1999.). The vitamins include: Vitamin A (retinal), Vitamin B group (B1-thiamine, B2-riboflavin, B6-pyridoxine, B12-cobalamin), Vitamin C (ascorbic acid), Vitamin D (calciferol), Vitamin E (tocopherol) and Vitamin K, biotin, folate, pantothenic acid and Niacin (Lieberman & Bruning 1990). Carbohydrates and fats serve as the main sources of

Read the assignment carefully before you start Essay - 1

Read the assignment carefully before you start - Essay Example Law and economics is more likely than other branches of legal examination to use empirical or statistical methods to measure these responses to incentives. Law and economics shares with other branches of economics the supposition that individuals are rational and respond to incentive My choice was also based on the economic principle of how people respond to incentives. As people make decisions by comparing costs or benefits, their behavior might change when the costs or benefits vary. This is a characteristic of law and economics as it emphasize on incentives and people’s responses to these incentives. For instance, the resolution of damage payments in an accident, law is not to reimburse injured victims, but rather to offer an incentive for potential injurers to take effective cost-justified insurances to evade causing the accident. In sum, law and economics will enable me to minimize on the financial frauds such as bankruptcy, creditors-debtors misery. Specializing in law and economy will assist in intensifying contracts and corporations in order to gain efficiency in any branch of economics. That is to say, law and economy crosscuts all the branches of

Minor’s Refusal of Treatment Essay Example for Free

Minor’s Refusal of Treatment Essay In the case of Daniel Hauser, a thirteen-year old boy from Minnesota, who was diagnosed as having Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which is considered as one of the most curable types of cancer, conflicting ethical values can be appreciated.   According to Wikipedia (2009), the principle of autonomy gives the person the right to self-determination which allows the patients to choose their own treatment.   In the case provided, the patient wishes not to endure traditional chemotherapy and radiation but instead undergo alternative medicine treatments that are yet to be proven effective by science. Since the health care providers in the case know that this particular type of cancer is curable, they are very adamant in trying to convince the patient to undergo proper treatment.   This exemplifies the principle of beneficence, which refer to the health care providers’ actions that promote the well-being of the patient (Wikipedia 2009) while the principle of non-maleficience means that the health care providers should refrain from actions that can cause harm to the patient (Wikipedia 2009) such as deviating from the standard form of treatment. The four senses of autonomy which are free action, effective deliberation, authenticity and moral reflection are being exercised by the patient.   Free action refers to the patient’s choice to ignore the recommendations of his health care providers and opting to do what he believes is right for him without any force or intimidation from anyone.   Effective deliberation means that the patient duly understands the facts and the risks before he made his decision in a systemic and rational way. In our case, the patient knows the risk that he is taking when he refused medical treatments.   Authenticity means the ability of the patient to be true to his self as exemplified by his belief and claim to be a medicine man.   Moral reflection means to act on the person’s accepted after beliefs after critical assessment.   The patient believes that he is leading by example through standing firm on his decision to avoid the prescribed medical treatment and undergo alternative forms of therapy. The case that the lawyers have against the Daniel’s parents is based on the subjective good of the patient which is the cure of his cancer through chemotherapy and radiation treatments that he simply does not prefer.   The stand of the Daniel’s parents, on the other hand, is based on the objective good of the patient, which is respecting the values and wishes of the patient to undergo alternative forms of treatment such as drinking ionized water and modifying his diet. Although a person may be freely entitled to choose for themselves, certain liberty limiting principles should be observed.   These principles include paternalism, which justifiably restricts a person’s liberty to prevent the person from harming himself and the harm principle, which justifiably restricts a person’s liberty to prevent the person from harming others (Arisaka 2009). The principle of paternalism can only be applied if the courts would rule in favor of the medical practitioners who are asking that the patient should be subjected to the standard treatment for Hodgkin’s disease.   The judicial system would violate the harm principle if they would allow the minor patient to choose to act on his beliefs to not undergo proper remedies because this may pave the way for other teens to have the choice to refuse treatment and simply do what they think is right for them. Measures in order for minors to understand the gravity of their disease should be undertaken.   Participation with group discussions with others who are suffering the same illness should be encouraged in order to gain more understanding on what to expect of the disease and its treatment rather than simply being subjected to a grueling process of standard therapy without any form of support and being forced to decide based on the experience. Bibliography Arisaka (2009). Ethics. Retreived 5 June 2009 from http://www.arisaka.org/ethics02LLP.html Wikipedia (2009). Medical ethics.   Retreived 5 June 2009 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_ethics

An Enquiry Concerning The Principles Of Morals Essay example -- essays

What is a moral? This is a question that has plagued philosophers for many years. Is it possible to have a set of universal morals? There are many questions that surround the mystery of morals. They seem to drive our every action. We base our decisions on what is right and what is wrong. But what is it that actually determines what is right and what is wrong? Is it our sense of reason? Is it our sense of sentiment? This is a question that David Hume spent much of his life pondering. What exactly is it that drives our actions? Yes, morals drive them, but what determines what our morals are? What is it that ultimately drives our actions; our feelings or our minds? Hume would say that it is our sentiment that ultimately drives our actions. According to Hume, reason is incapable of motivating an action. According to Hume, reason cannot fuel an action and therefore cannot motivate it. Hume feel that all actions are motivated by our sentiment. For example, on page 84 Appendix I, he gives the example of a criminal. "It resides in the mind of the person, who is ungrateful. He must, therefore, feel it, and be conscious of it." Here, it is evident that Hume is saying that unless the person, or criminal in this case, sincerely believes in what he wants to do, he will not be able to motivate the action. In other words, unless the sentiment is there, the action cannot be willed into being. Hence, the sentiment is the driving force behind the action. Hume does not however say that reason is incapable of determining wether an action is virtuous or vicious (moral or immoral), but instead he tries to say that the reason for the morality of an action does not dictate the execution or perversion of an act so far as determination of wether the action is executed or not. In simpler terms, reason has it's place in determining morality, but it is not in the motivation of an action. Motivation must come from the heart, or better yet, from within the person; from their beliefs. Reason merely allows the person to make moral distinctions. Without reason, there would be no morality. Without reason, one moral clause would not be differentiable from another. That is to say that below all morals, there must be some underlying truth because "Truth is disputable; n... ...reasons are NOT necessarily the person's sentiments, they do not motivate actions. One other reason why reason does not impel action is because reason is based on truths. Truths are never changing whereas sentiments are dynamic and are in a constant change of flux. At one moment, the criminal could feel sympathy for his victims and decide to spare a life, and the very next, the same criminal could become enraged at the pimple on a hostage's forehead and shoot him. Of course these are extreme cases, but the point is clear. Reason would dictate that only the first action would be moral. If reason drove actions, then moral behavior would prevail and there would be no immoral actions and hence there would be no crimes. This shows how sentiments can change as the individual's perception of the universe changes. Obviously, the driving force behind the criminal shooting the victim because of a skin blemish is not one based on reason, but instead it is based on feeling, emotion, sentiment. Although it is an abstract idea and a seemingly tiny technicality, it is easy to see that indeed reason is not the ultimate motivator but instead sentiment is.